Pro Football Hall of Famer Kurt Warner has voiced his frustration with NFL analysts who claim to have a comprehensive understanding of games just one day after they’re played.
Warner, known for his meticulous approach to studying the game, took to social media to challenge the rapid judgments made by commentators after a full Sunday slate.
In a series of posts on X, Warner questioned how many experts are able to offer in-depth assessments so quickly without sufficient time to properly analyze the games.
“I have been grinding tape since 8 p.m. last night, and I’ve gotten through 10 games. How do all these people talk about these players and teams on a Monday as if they have watched the games and really can evaluate them? Can you guys share your routine so I can see if it’s more efficient?” Warner posted.
Warner, who led the Rams to a Super Bowl title in 1999 and had a stint with the New York Giants in 2004, also noted that he watches the All-22 film, a coach’s view that offers a much more complete picture of the action, as opposed to the standard television broadcast.
According to Warner, the broadcast doesn’t provide nearly enough information to make thorough assessments of players, especially quarterbacks.
After reviewing film of the New York Giants’ 21-18 loss to the Washington Commanders, Warner singled out New York quarterback Daniel Jones for praise.
“Yes, DJ looked great – may have been the best QB play-to-play this week – although Kyler [Murray] was pretty awesome with so many explosive plays!” Warner posted in response to a question about Jones’ performance.
Jones completed 16 of 28 passes for 178 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. As usual, the numbers only tell part of the story as Jones showed major improvement from his Week 1 outing against the Minnesota Vikings.
Of course, Warner was taking a sarcastic shot at all the football “experts” who speak in such confident extremes about players immediately following games.
Warner expanded on his thoughts during an appearance on The Pat McAfee Show this afternoon…
“They’re not watching the film … I’m always amazed when somebody can evaluate all these players on a Monday.”
“The biggest thing for me is when somebody says something and I know that’s not the case … It irritates me for the player because they’re creating a narrative that isn’t accurate.”
What are your thoughts on Warner’s take?
Which NFL analysts do you respect the most when it comes to player evaluation? (Besides Warner, Brian Baldinger and Greg Cosell are two who put in the work and watch countless hours of All-22 film.)
What football “experts” do you think are the worst when it comes to what Warner is referring to???
